[BCMA] charged semantics
Moderated BCMA subscriber listserv
listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca
Wed Jun 16 10:50:55 PDT 2021
The comments came in the form of 'comments' on our museum's social media posts, from existing followers who happen to be First Nations. Many First Nations people here are Ktunaxa, and the last comment was on a post about a Ktunaxa writer and her work.
Thanks, everyone, for great conversation points.
From: Listserv <listserv-bounces at lists.museum.bc.ca> On Behalf Of Moderated BCMA subscriber listserv
Sent: June 16, 2021 11:15 AM
To: listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca
Subject: Re: [BCMA] charged semantics
Hey just looking for more context towards these comments; who are they coming from/how are they being communicated?
I often encounter the word traditional in land acknowledgments, knowledge holders, and culture also practices.
Again just trying to understand it all
From: Listserv <listserv-bounces at lists.museum.bc.ca<mailto:listserv-bounces at lists.museum.bc.ca>> on behalf of Moderated BCMA subscriber listserv <listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca<mailto:listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 3:11:02 PM
To: listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca<mailto:listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca> <listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca<mailto:listserv at lists.museum.bc.ca>>
Subject: [BCMA] charged semantics
I hope you are well.
Twice now, the Cranbrook History Museum has received comments on our use of the word 'traditional' when referring to 'traditions' of two separate Indigenous tribes.
This was the last comment: "It still is Ktunaxa territory, traditional is past tense and means of erasure."
Does anyone have thoughts and do you have references for them?
I will acquiesce to and am happy to receive consultation from any Indigenous leader(s) in the field.
Visitor Experience Coordinator
Cranbrook History Centre
info at cranbrookhistorycentre.com<mailto:info at cranbrookhistorycentre.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Listserv